From the death penalty to same-sex relationships, a new poll shows huge shifts in what Canadian really believe according to Maclean’s magazine.
According to the magazine, an Ontario court judge will soon decide if Canada’s prostitution laws should be struck down. In British Columbia, the Supreme Court will decide if laws prohibiting polygamy can still be enforced. And in the House of Commons, a private member’s bill would make it legal for the profoundly ill to seek a doctor’s help to commit suicide. As a nation we are reinventing, refining—or undermining—our morality in dramatic fashion the magazine added.
With so many moral issues at a crossroads, Angus Reid Strategies undertook a national survey last month asking Canadians to consider 21 ethical issues. Their answers—on issues as diverse as animal rights, prostitution, homosexuality and illegal drug use—show some profound divisions by gender and region. But taken together, they seem to reveal a rather astounding liberal tilt in our morality, albeit with some exceptions.
The question was asked: Consider these six sticky moral situations. Which are the most and the least acceptable to you, and to most Canadians?
1. You plan to have an abortion. 2. You wear a mink coat. 3. You favour killing convicted murderers. 4. You think the dying have the right to commit suicide with a doctor’s help. 5. You don’t care if the drugs you buy have been tested on animals. 6. You support medical research using the stem cells of human embryos.
I am no fan of surveys. They always tend to produce what the authors where looking for. However they help us see or remind us in a more dramatic way what we already know. For example, most of us will agree without a survey that people are more and more interested in animal rights than Human Rights.
According to the survey there’s never been a better time to be a Canadian mink, or a seal, or a lab rat. Canadians today are more likely to moralize about the treatment of animals than about the lives of our fellow humans. Just 22 per cent oppose euthanasia, but 41 per cent condemn medical testing on animals, the survey found. Abortion is considered morally wrong by 22 per cent of Canadians, fewer than the 31 per cent who have moral qualms about wearing fur. But while four in 10 oppose animal testing, only 17 per cent take issue with researchers using human embryonic stem cells. As for capital punishment, 53 per cent of Canadians consider it “morally acceptable,” a jump of six percentage points since Reid last asked the question in 2007.
Now the big question is Why is it so? Why is the morality in “declension”? No one on the survey or any “intellectual” consulted can really give us a satisfying answer.
“Morality is actually very complicated stuff in terms of where it comes from and what we hang onto, and how we change,” says Kerry Bowman, a bioethicist at the University of Toronto’s Joint Centre for Bioethics. Bowman says ethical choices are shaped to an extent by a complex response to the issues of the day, but that a person’s ethical core goes far deeper, to an evolved instinct that predates religion and even humans themselves. “Contemporary religions, the great religions of the world, are really only a few thousand years old and they really would not resonate if they weren’t plugging into something that already existed,” says Bowman.
What??? [An evolved ethical instinct that predates religion and even humans themselves]? Have you noticed that line? So moral life has nothing to do with religion or any set rule of conduct. It depends rather on instinctive behaviour and necessity and circumstances of the time. There might be some truth that each generation faces different challenges but to say that morality has nothing to do with religion is another way to reject the morality promoted by the Bible as the measuring standard for human life. More over the conclusion from the argument is since Christianity is relatively young its message cannot be used as reference to morality. If humans are not religious and if there is something before them that should dictate the rules morality and ethics what what was there before human beings? Please help me out here!
The real answer to moral shifts is the rejection of God and his word for righteous living. That is no surprise at all. It has always been so since the Garden. To say there is no high moral authority that should guide our lives and at the same time pretend to make moral laws out of nothing is a contradiction. We must have a perfect reference point. For some, religion is infringing on their freedom to do whatever they want and yet at the same time within their conscience they wish to live as God requires. And since they happen to reject the Bible, they have to make their own rules and ideas that fit their lifestyle. As a result, the guilt of conscience of wrong doing ” is taken” away and since there is no longer a higher standard of morality as a reference, the right could be wrong and vice versa. Everything becomes relative. The Bible calls it perversion and abomination.
Perversion is a concept describing those types of human behaviour that are contrary or a serious deviation from what is considered to be normal and orthodox by the society. There is yet more shifting and awkward/backward behaviours to come. Paul says:
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them...For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened...Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones...Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. Romans 1: 18-32.
The answer to our moral deviation is not found in any theory or on a campus but in Genesis 3 when the first man Adam decided to make his own rules. And thank God there is a new Adam, Jesus Christ who unlike Adam did not make his own rules but obey the will of God the Father in order to redeem our wicked and depraved nature. That’s the old gospel no intellectual will be able to change.
Full article please click here What Canadians really believe